Ha oui, étrange ça. J'imagine que pour la sortie des intras ils vont avoir eu le temps de recevoir les notices ? Chrisdu18e les a pré-commandé, il nous dira ce qu'il a reçu de son côté !Vic a écrit :^^ C'est le livret. D'ailleurs c'est celui des SMx, alors que c'est une autre gamme, et il n'y a aucune indication sur les réglages !
J'en doutekookaburra a écrit :Ha oui, étrange ça. J'imagine que pour la sortie des intras ils vont avoir eu le temps de recevoir les notices ? Chrisdu18e les a pré-commandé, il nous dira ce qu'il a reçu de son côté ! :)Vic a écrit :^^ C'est le livret. D'ailleurs c'est celui des SMx, alors que c'est une autre gamme, et il n'y a aucune indication sur les réglages !
Pourquoi pas, mais tes conduits sont trop petitsharpX a écrit :Je t'apporte mes EM4 pour comparaison directe si tu veuxVic a écrit :En fait, enfin plutôt de ce que j'entends, on aurait la signature de l'EM2, l'EM4, l'EM32.
There have been a lot of questions about the EarSonics Velvet universal in-ear monitor and how it compares with other universal fit EarSonics products, so I have done comparisons to the SM64 and S-EM6, which are below.
Vs. SM64:
Sharing the EarSonics sound signature, the SM64 has a more laid-back presentation but a smaller average soundstage and less capability to project sound in the distance. Imaging, layering, and presentation depth are better from the Velvet, which offers a more clear and concise presentation. Average note ADSR is similar, but the Velvet has a more natural decay resulting in a smoother, more natural sound. Detail levels are significantly higher with the Velvet and resolution within the soundstage is also better. Transparency and coherence are also better from the Velvet.
Bass of the Velvet is more prominent, especially deep bass, even at a quarter turn of the bass knob, conveying much more power. Warmth is similar as is thickness. The Velvet has a good deal more clarity within the midrange with a cleaner sound that conveys more detail and adds layers the SM64 doesn’t have resulting in a more involving experience. The upper midrange of the SM64 is more laid-back, as is the treble, and the quality of the Velvet in both areas is superior.
Vs. S-EM6:
The Velvet and S-EM6 share EarSonics house sound characteristics, but have different presentation perspectives and average note speed. The bass adjustment knob of the Velvet can turn the bass up significantly higher than what the S-EM6 naturally produces, with about a quarter turn from minimum for an equivalent level. Spatially, the Velvet has a slightly more laid-back presentation perspective and a more open sound but a slightly smaller overall space while the S-EM6 has better imaging for a more realistic and resolving soundstage. Notes of the S-EM6 are a bit more analytical yet thicker, with a sharper attack and decay yet longer sustain leading to a good deal more detail and punch despite the thicker sound. Coherence and transparency are similar while clarity is slightly superior with the Velvet.
Deep bass of the Velvet is more pronounced than the S-EM6 at all but the absolute lowest knob settings, which results in similar amounts. When the sub-bass is adjusted to similar levels, the S-EM6 is warmer. Bass quality is close, but the S-EM6 is a bit tighter with better laying. While the S-EM6’s more forward presentation has better layering and presentation depth, the slightly more laid-back Velvet has a cleaner sound that is more open. The upper midrange of the Velvet is slightly more prominent in relation to the midrange than the S-EM6, as is the treble. Treble notes are smoother on the Velvet, but more revealing of issues with poor quality tracks.
The universal shell of the Velvet has a longer distance from the housing to the end of the nozzle resulting in a better fit. Sensitivity is similar, but the soundstage presentation and note characterizes allow the Velvet to retain its clarity at louder volumes.
by average_joe
Ca dépends de la taille des oreilleskookaburra a écrit : Sur la seconde, on voit les Velvet portés : ça donne une bonne idée de la taille des bestiaux.
50 pièces maxi concernés dans le monde, juste des écouteurs droits. Prise en charge SAV garanti. C'est bon à savoir !Thank you for this information,
For the return of your Velvet no problem ,
Thanks to a international distributor return, we have identify a one day material injection problem on a punctual manufacturing serie, this problem only concern the right side shell, (less than 50 units are involved).
Anyone with a Velvet presenting this default (only on the right side) can contact Earsonics to enjoy an exchange with a new model.
We are very sorry of that and we will do all the necessary to replace those units as soon as we receive it..
Cordialement / Sincerely
: - 
